Feed on
Posts
Comments

The Emerging Church

To those who would surmise that “The Emerging Church” and all that it entails, is merely a blip on the radar of history, I would submit, think again. There is a radical departure from the Gospel Of Jesus Christ taking place from within and without the “collective” Church today and it would behoove all who profess faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ to become aware of what is taking place and what is to come. For an in depth overview of the history, process and objectives of this movement, I would recommend the following link as a good starting point:

http://www.soundwitness.org/evangel/emerg_all_parts.htm

To be candid, Eckhart Tolle’s “A New Earth” is just the tip of the iceberg, and it is indicative of the magnitude of “the shift” into the realm of mysticism that is currently taking place. This is not a blip, it is big and it is getting bigger. It is imperative that Bible believing Christians comprehend the importance of establishing and maintaining a baseline in adhering to the Word of God. I shall include a small excerpt from the aforementioned link that encapsulates the Good News of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Establishing a Baseline

In order to discuss the Gospel and at the same time be able to compare apples with apples, the Gospel will first be presented in its pre-deconstructed form.

The Gospel presented here is the historic, orthodox, readily discernible Gospel as found in Scripture. It is the reason I write. “For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek” (Romans 1:16).

When people think of the Gospel, they generally think of a verse out of the New Testament, such as John 3:16. But the Gospel story begins long before the New Testament. It begins before the angelic announcement of a Savior in the book of Luke. It begins in the beginning, in the book of Genesis.

When God created Adam and Eve, he created them in His own image. But that image didn’t last long. The perfect communion we had with God was destroyed when Adam and Eve ate of the forbidden fruit. Our God-like image was ruined by the fall - we are sinners from conception, enemies of God, cast out of the garden. We are doomed to painful childbirth, toiling for food all the days of our lives, and death. Yet God had a plan to restore our communion with Him, through the promise of a Savior, Jesus Christ. That promise is first seen in Genesis 3:15, “he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.” That promise is foreshadowed and revisited throughout the Old Testament. It is promised through the Covenant God makes with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It is foreshadowed when Abraham offers his son Isaac as a sacrifice. It is foreshadowed in the Passover, when the Israelites are miraculously brought out of Egypt, saved by the blood of a lamb painted on the lintels of their doors. It is foreshadowed by the scapegoat, who carries the sins of the Israelites into the desert to make atonement. It is prophesied throughout the Old Testament by the prophets.

As we arrive at the dawn of the New Testament, the time line resumes not with the birth of Jesus, but with the foretelling of the birth of John the Baptist (in the book of Luke). John the Baptist came, significantly, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. Man’s sin is the crux of the problem. God is a holy God - He does not tolerate sin. God’s just penalty for sin is death. The only way God could fulfill His promise of a Savior was to sacrifice “a lamb without blemish,” a sinless human being who would fulfill the Law and pay our penalty. The only way God could forgive each of us for our guilt and depravity was to offer up His only-begotten Son, who, being God, could intercede for each of us – a sacrifice of infinite value. Jesus became our scapegoat, carrying our sins to the cross, suffering the death penalty we deserve. In His bodily resurrection, He defeated sin, death, and the devil. He has gone to prepare a place for us, in heaven.

Jesus has not left us alone. He has given us His Holy Spirit, who works through the Word to preserve believers in the true faith, and to bring others to Christ, offering them His forgiveness, life, and salvation through the power of the Gospel message. He comes to all believers through Baptism, and through Holy Communion, renewing us daily. Which brings us full circle back to Jesus’ words in John 3:16-18:

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.”

While God is love, he is also just. Those who reject the Gospel are condemned eternally to hell. God offers salvation to all, yet some refuse to believe.

Those who are saved by faith in Jesus as their Savior also deserve condemnation, but God sees them as holy because of Jesus substitutionary death and resurrection. God’s grace is given to believers, without any action or worthiness on their part. The Gospel truly is good news.

Wayne Wohler submitted a comment recently with regard to the violence that we see in the Old Testament (see Comments “The I Am That I Am of the Holy Scriptures Versus the I AM of Eckhart Tolle”). This subject is worthy of some study because it is a subject that frequently is raised. I invite you to read his comments and mine.

While surfing the web I ran across a group of Christians who are doing a weekly, chapter by chapter review of Eckhart Tolle’s book “A New Earth” that sheds some down to earth Christian insight on the subject. They have graciously given me permission to reproduce their findings on this site. The author of their commentary is called “Stushie” and the website is located at http://stushie.wordpress.com/

The first installment of their collective commentary (italics are mine) is as follows:

Chapter One
Page 1: Tolle begins with his opinion about what happened on earth 114 million years ago. Obviously because he wasn’t there, this is just his opinion. This sets the tone for the whole book: he is making up his own reality about the world. Tolle suggests that there was no perceiving consciousness to witness the flowering of the world: in other words, God was not there and doesn’t seem to exist for Tolle.

Page 2: Tolle writes that flowers were the first things that human beings were drawn and fascinated to, outside of themselves – but where did that facility to be fascinated originate? From the flowers? From human beings? Or endowed by the Creator in our DNA? He also states that Jesus told us to contemplate the flowers and learn from them how to live. When Jesus taught His “Consider the Lilies” lesson, He was using it to express our dependency on the providence and mercy of God. The parable is not about us – it’s about God. (Note: Tolle will often use Christ’s teachings to express his own opinions, and not those of Jesus Himself.) Flowers lead us to an appreciation of our own inner beauty. This will be a common theme throughout the book. This is spiritual narcissism – the love of ourselves as the source of our spirituality. This seriously opposes our love, wonder, and fascination with God.

Page 3: Flowers are messengers from another realm…and fragrance comes from the realm of the spirit. This sounds like New Age stuff. He widens the conventional accepted meaning of ‘enlightenment’ to incorporate his own ideas…and yet his teaching is unconventional. Tolle: enlightenment brings about discontinuity with the old, helping us leap beyond the past into experiencing a new evolved level of Being and Self Awareness . Christian teaching would suggest that enlighten is the process by which we are over-awed with the wonder of God and attracted to Him. Tolle is substituting our own self-awareness in place of becoming truly aware of God.

Page 4: Tolle talks about One Life, One Consciousness. This is not original. This is more Jungian (Carl Jung) than Tollian. Tolle emphasizes “Presence” – Hebrews would call this shekinah – the glory of God, the sacredness of His presence. Tolle believes that we recognize this Presence within us and love it as ourselves. Once again, God is being displaced in favor of narcissism.

Page 5: Mainly deals with enlightenment in a Buddhist way of thinking. Tolle states that the Holy Spirit is preparing the ground for a planetary shift of consciousness. This is very serious because this is blasphemy. The purpose of the Holy Spirit is to reveal Christ to the world, not to bring about an evolutionary consciousness.

Page 6: Tolle references Jesus as a great teacher and messenger. He will very rarely use the term Christ and never refer to Jesus as the Son of God. Tolle also infers that Christ’s ministry was a failure because of the opposition to Him. His teachings did not transform many lives…and yet there are about 2 billion followers of Christ in today’s world. Tolle describes his book as a ‘transformational device, he is trying to canonize his own text. Reading the book will transform you….this is a frequent mantra in the book.

Page 7: This book is about you. Tolle stroking the ego of his readers to gain their patronage and appreciation. Narcissism. In contrast, the Bible is not about you…it’s about God. Tolle states that the book can only awaken those who are ready….this is the old Emperor’s New Clothes argument. Begins to write about ego – becoming Freudian and will start to apply pseudo-psychology here. Tolle states that the ego tricks the mind into identifying with it with no flexibility…this is going to morph into an argument against absolutes and Truth.

Page 8: Author suggests that when we triumph over ego, we become the light of consciousness – in other words, we are the light that we are looking for. In contrast, Jesus would say that we are the Light of the world and that he is the Light we are looking for. Tolle begins to reference religions as ancient…by implication, he is suggesting that they are outdated, instead of timelessly relevant. He also begins to reference his idea that sin is a madness, a dysfunction of who we truly are.

Page 9: Equates sin with dysfunction, it is not a selfish choice. He also interprets the NT Greek word “sin” as something that means missing the point of our human existence. This shows his shallowness of New Testament knowledge. The word for sin actually means to miss the mark – standard or expectation – that God has set for us. It’s not about our human existence; it’s about disappointing God.

Page 10: SIN = MADNESS…which will mean that we are not personally accountable for our sinful actions. This is New Age Narcissism. Tolle begins the old argument that religion breeds violence and conflicts.

Page 11: Talks about the horrors of Stalin, Hitler and Pol Phot – Agreed. He also emphasizes the environmental wreckage of the planet that is brought about by our greed.

Page 12: Fear, greed, and the desire for power are the psychological forces that cause most conflicts. Tolle believes that they cause a misconception and distortion of our true human perception. Dysfunction entirely replaces sin. Tolle suggests that we cannot get rid of this dysfunction without a shift in our consciousness. This means that there is no room for Christ as our Savior.

Page 13: We cannot be good by trying to be good; we can only do this by finding the good within ourselves. This opposes Christ’s teaching: only God is good. For Tolle, there is no source of good outside of us…therefore Man replaces God. Tolle: Good News – radical transformation of human consciousness. He is deliberately using the Gospel term to proclaim his own philosophy. This is in direct contrast to Christian teaching and promotes a false gospel. Tolle suggests that Jesus called enlightenment ‘salvation.’ Tolle: salvation is truly understanding yourself….but for Christ salvation is the realization of needing to be rescued from God’s wrath and the process through Christ’s sacrifice in which it is done.

Page 14: Self-recognition is the greatest human achievement — narcissism all over again. Recognizing our insanity/dysfunction is the beginning of healing and transcendence….Jesus is kicked into the gutter and the Cross is absolutely useless.

Page 15: Tolle writes about the original teachings of religious leaders being changed through the generations and were not part of the original ministry. He is subtly attacking the veracity of the Gospels. He furthers expresses his own opinion that the unpopularity of the teachers’ teaching got them killed, which made others worship them as gods. This is an attack on Christ’s ministry of atonement through sacrifice and His divinity as the Son of God. Tolle also states that religions are more divisive than unifying – that’s an old argument which doesn’t hold water. Religions unify millions upon millions of people. Tolle then expresses his rejection of some being right and others wrong. This is the modern non-absolutionists’ argument…there are no rights or wrongs…Goes against Gospel teaching. Tolle suggests that Man made God in his image. Humanism. This is a direct attack on our Creator. He suggests that we have reduced the infinite and un-nameable to a mental idol. Christians, however, worship God as Christ’s Father.

Page 16: Tolle writes that the real message is the truth that lies within us…narcissism again. As opposed to Christ being The Truth. Tolle references Gnosticism as a rediscovery of the real truth and intensification of the light. Obviously, he has not read the texts and is caught up in a false Da Vinci Code moment. Gnosticism is emphasized as a true realization and inner transformation of self…and yet they rejected the physical self and believed that the body is bad.

Page 17: Tolle belabors the point that only a small minority had access to these truths because the Church oppressed and suppressed them. Obviously he hasn’t read the history of Gnosticism and its cultic practices. Tolle extols the differences between spirituality and religion. This is what Christ also taught, BUT Jesus did not abandon His religion – He still went to synagogue to teach and to worship on the Sabbath. Tolle suggests that our religious beliefs systems separate us from the spiritual dimensions within ourselves…Tolle is subtly enticing people away from God…our spiritual navels are more important that our relationship with God.

Page 18: Tolle writes about new spirituality movements arising out of the existing religious structures…for example, the New Emergent Church in Christianity. Tolle describes the Western Church as the most mind dominated faith on the planet…he is going to equate this with egotism. He does not however, suggest that the Church’s domination saved civilization and actually engendered enlightenment. Begins to state the old New Age argument that ancient Eastern wisdom is beginning to influence the West, as if the Eastern ways were better….but look at the state of most countries with Eastern wisdom…they are practically the poorest and most oppressed on earth! Did Eastern wisdom spawn documents like the Magna Carta or Declaration of Independence? Liberty and life are more valued in Western Church countries than in Eastern wisdom nations. Tolle suggests that we let go of dogma in order to discover the true spiritual depth within ourselves…in other words experience spiritual narcissism over the teachings of the Church.

Page 19: Any opposition to Tolle new transformational conscious is called the ‘entrenchment of ego.’ He is stating that institutionalized religion is about idolizing the institution, but he has missed the point altogether. Religious institutions normally exist to serve God, not the believer. Tolle writes that the collective ego will fight back…in other words, churches will oppose his philosophy. They will be mentally closed to his ideas…no, we disagree with them. It comes down to this: whom do we trust? Tolle and Oprah, or Christ and God? Tolle declares that religious institutions will disintegrate from within…but we’ve heard this all before – Voltaire & the French Revolution, as well as Soviet Communism (which lasted 100 years), but the Church still survives and thrives. Atheism & New Age keep declaring the death of God and the Church…but the fact is this: the Church is still growing worldwide.

Page 20: Tolle argues that through the process of evolution, species & life forms will either become extinct or rise above their limitations…to survive requires an evolutionary leap. He writes about evolutionary processes…but these are physical changes, not spiritual ones.

Page 21: Tolle’s controversial statement about spiritually evolving or dying – This is fascism…submit or die…spiritual eugenics. He then claims that he is not promoting a new belief system…but that is precisely what he and Oprah are establishing.

Page 22: Tolle urges his readers not to take their identity from the old ways of consciousness. Yet Christians belong to Christ. Our spiritual identity is established in Him. Tolle is subtly arguing that we ditch Christ for ourselves. Tolle then questions the reality of evil. It’s a matter of dysfunction and madness for him. If evil is not real according to Tolle, then Christ is the Savior of nothing and His death is meaningless.

Page 23: Tolle states that he took the title of his book from scriptural references…Isaiah 65:17 and Revelation 21:1. He argues that the new heaven and new earth represent his transformational consciousness as reflected in the physical realm. He believes that this is what Christ taught…that the new heaven and new earth are not places, but new transformational ideas. However, both scriptures emphasize places…
Isaiah 65:17-18 Behold, I will create new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind. But be glad and rejoice forever in what I will create, for I will create Jerusalem to be a delight and its people a joy.
Revelation 21:1 Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea.
Tolle is falsely advocating his view as being the same as Christ’s. He ends the chapter with a suggestion that human life and human consciousness are intrinsically one with the planet…but this is not what Genesis teaches. Tolle suggestion is perhaps borrowed more from the movie “Excalibur,” when the secret of the Holy Grail is discovered…that Arthur and the Land are one.

More to follow new week…..

An excellent Christian review of “A New Earth” that is worthy of consideration:

http://gregboyd.blogspot.com/2008/04/echhart-tolles-new-earth-book-review.html

The Yardstick of God’s Revelation

The causes and the remedy for the current situation of the world, as put forth in Eckhart Tolles book , “A New Earth” are relatively easy to comprehend, if you entertain and accept his rationale on how things came to be as they currently are and the solution that he puts forth to correct it. Of course, in order to do that, one has to accept his explanation of what has taken place in the past, including all recorded history, right up to our current moment in time. And one also has to accept the solution that he expounds upon to change our faulted perception. It would appear that there are a lot of people that are willing, if not eager, to do this and the reason why this is happening is not difficult to understand because from a wide scope, his overview of the track record of man’s nature, and the current status of the world, has a ring of truth to it because our world is not the place most of us wish it could be.

Everyone that I know of, has formed an opinion on this subject in one form or another. Some of these opinions are simplistic and others have been formulated from serious observation and contemplation, producing varied explanations as to why  things have gone wrong and what needs to be done to make it right. The need to find a solution to the way things are going is obvious. Humanity as a whole is not living in harmony with one another and mans ability to display his capability of acting inhumanly towards his fellow man, in all of its varied forms, appears to be increasing rather than diminishing. One could put forth that there are reasons why the negatives appear to be increasing, such as world population growth, diminishing resources, man’s misuse of our natural environment and the resulting changes taking place in our world climate, but in short, that would overlook the nature of man himself, and that has and is a deciding factor in why things are not looking good and I, like many, could not agree more.

Throughout history, man has tried a variety of external physical means to protect and expand the status quo of their own limited environment. This could be the application of force, the construction of walled fortresses and the expansion of their territory or empire, to name but a very few. And this self centered approach continues to this very day. Has or is this approach productive or counterproductive towards living in harmony? Ones answer to this question could depend upon whether you are inside or outside of a protective circle but if we look at it from a world wide perspective, the answer is pretty obvious that it is not productive if living in harmony is the objective.

This problem is not new, it has been a problem before history began to be recorded. Not everyone in the sand box wants to share, or be considerate or even entertain the option of giving you a voice to what is acceptable or not acceptable in the sand box. or as a final extreme, wants to have you in their sand box in the first place. This, unfortunately is a reality of life. Most of us understand this reality and attribute it to the imperfect nature or characteristics of man and most of us acknowledge that this problem needs correcting.

Approaches to solving this problem have long been aimed at attempting to change the nature or characteristics of man inwardly, from a moral or spiritual perspective, so that the application of external physical protective resources are not necessary. And once again, from this perspective, comes a large variety of methods, each claiming that their perspective is the correct method to employ to correct the problem. Some of these methods depend upon the individual reaching a level of enlightenment or awareness to become more divine like in nature, an upward climb if you will, and others involve a direct revelation from God to explain and remedy the problematic human nature of man.

Then, just to make things interesting, we see in recorded history, that even this “spiritual” approach to solving the problem, when elevated to a position of authority and power, can be misused and changed into a spiritual representation of a physical external force whereby the masses are controlled internally and the empire continues to expand and the status quo for a select few is maintained. Human nature is human nature. Power corrupts and absolute power absolutely corrupts. Does that mean that all “spiritual” approaches to solving the problem are subject to, or limited by the shortcomings of man’s nature, some would answer yes, some would answer no. From a simplistic perspective, this would or could depend on the level of enlightenment or attainment achieved in following the spiritual path chosen by the individual. We all have seen ample examples of spiritual solutions that have fallen short of the intended mark due to the susceptible nature of man.

This is where Eckhart Tolle steps in, and his book “A New Earth”, to explain his reasoning why there have been failures and to shed his perception of light on the road to attainment of the universal oneness, which, if accepted by a big enough critical mass of world inhabitants, could bring about a shift in mindset and produce the harmony that we assume, the vast majority of world inhabitants  intellectually would like to strive for.

Although Tolle’s answer to the problem appears new to the vast majority of our western civilization, his major themes are far from new, but in fact, can be traced back to the Upanishads, the concluding portions of the Vedas (the oldest Hindu scriptures). The Upanishads contain the essence of Vedic teaching and are the foundation of present day Hinduism.  These Vedas teach that all men can achieve the divine state if they strive for it. Tolle says it like this (all quotations are from “A New World” by Eckhart Tolle):

“Can I sense my essential Beingness, the I Am, in the background of my life at all times? To be more accurate, can I sense the I Am that I Am at this moment? Can I sense my essential identity as consciousness itself?” (p.79)

“The Truth is inseparable from who you are. Yes, you are the Truth.” (p.71)

“You realize your essential identity as formless, as an all-pervasive Presence, or Being, prior to all forms, all identifications. You realize your true identity as consciousness itself, rather than what consciousness had identified with.”(p.57)

In the Upanishads the individual personality is denied. It is considered a part of the world of illusion or “maya.” Deification involves the shedding of maya and the emerging and obliteration of the self in the One Reality, God. This, of course, is the theme of A New Earth.

Tolle’s emphasis on the “ego” is not about what most people assume. Most people assume that by “ego” he means pride, arrogance and selfishness. That is not at all the point of Tolle. Getting over the ego, to Tolle, is a denial of the individual personality and becoming “one with the consciousness.”

The Upanishads also teach that every part of the universe, both animate and inanimate objects, have essentially the same divine nature. In this teaching there is actually only one Self in the universe. Tolle agrees: “In most ancient cultures, people believed that everything, even so-called inanimate objects, had an indwelling spirit, and in this respect they were closer to the truth than we are today.” (p.37)

The Upanishads also teach that the body is the prison house of the soul. What is Tolle’s view on life, death and the afterlife? Tolle confesses his belief in reincarnation:

“Consciousness incarnates into the manifested dimension, that is to say, it becomes form. When it does so, it enters a dreamlike state…It loses itself in form, becomes identified with form. This could be described as the descent of the divine into matter…Glimpses of awakening come only at the moment of the dissolution of an individual from, that is to say, death. And then begins the next incarnation, the next identification with form, the next individual dream that is part of the collective dream. When the lion tears apart the body of the zebra, the consciousness that incarnated into the zebra-form detaches itself from the dissolving form and for a brief moment awakens to its essential immortal nature as consciousness; and then immediately falls back into sleep and reincarnates into another form.” (p.292)

For lack of better words, New Age philosophy is Hinduism wrapped in Western garb. Humanity’s primary problem, according to Hinduism, is that we have forgotten we are divine. The consequence is that we are subject to the Law of Karma, another important Hindu belief. This is the moral equivalent to the natural law of cause and effect. You always reap what you sow. There is no grace, there is no forgiveness, there is never any escape from consequences. It’s a very heavy burden to carry. Not only that, but Hinduism says that the consequences of our choices, both bad karma and good karma, follow us from lifetime to lifetime. This is another Hindu concept: samsara, the ever-revolving wheel of life, death, and rebirth, also known as reincarnation. A person’s karma determines the kind of body–whether human, animal, or insect–into which he or she is incarnated in the next lifetime.

The final major Hindu concept is liberation from the wheel of birth, death, and rebirth. One can only get off the reincarnation merry-go-round by realizing that the idea of the individual self is an illusion, and only the oneness of Brahman is real. There is no heaven, though–only losing one’s identity in the universal oneness.

To blend these concepts into our western societies religious perspective, Tolle quotes the Christian Bible over 25 times in this book. In most instances, he takes the verse out of context and misinterprets it to align with his viewpoint.

Thanks largely to Oprah Winfrey’s endorsement and utilization of her considerable  media resources of radio, TV and the Internet, large numbers of people, primarily from our North American society, have been buying into this “New Age” thinking.

So where does that leave us. I will grant you that the magnitude of the problem is profound (what do you do when someone wants to kick you and those you care for, out of the sandbox?) and the task of finding a solution to the problem that works, is even more profound, in fact it can become overwhelming when one begins to comprehend the magnitude of material available addressing the problem and the proposed solutions.

I adhere to the Christian faith, i.e. the Gospel of Jesus Christ. What I see happening is that the baby is being thrown out with the bath water and I will grant you, in the minds of many, the common perception of the Christian Church has given us just cause to do so. But, I would say, don’t confuse the perception of the Christian Church with the Gospel Of Jesus Christ. There is also a significant difference between the perception of the Christian Church and what the Christian Church actually is, throughout recorded history and in our very day. And, most importantly, the witness of the Holy Spirit , Jesus Christ and God the Father in our lives.

I cannot answer for someone else, I can only answer for myself. When I was in my mid twenties I recall sitting on a doorstep and saying to God, “God, if you are real, reveal yourself to me.” The next day as I again sat on the doorstep, God sent a young Christian man to sit down beside me and my journey began. Through the years I have learned many things, things about myself and things about God. I do believe that we have been given a Revelation from God and I do believe that His Revelation is found in our Christian Bible. To some, this is adhering to a “closed mentality” and in essence, this is true. But I also firmly believe that we have been given a yardstick with which we can compare God’s Revelation to us, from the other solutions set before us.

There are those who disagree with my premise that the Word of God is the authoritative yardstick by which we are to discern what is the message or Revelation that God has given us, and they would have me set aside what it says, so that I would accommodate their premise. That is to say, that there are alternate sources of illumination, alternate perspectives, which I should entertain. Furthermore, when I do quote a scripture from my yardstick that sends from my perspective, a pretty clear statement, an example of which is, ”Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” Acts 4:12“, the response is typically rooted in an alternate source, and invariably explains it away by indicating that “different labels” are being used from an alternate source and essentially there is no conflict between the alternate source and the meaning conveyed in the chosen scripture.

I do not buy that. The root of the argument is consistently centered on alternate sources. The institution of Christianity is not my yardstick, the Christian scriptures are. My personal relationship with God has not been overwhelmed by the institution of Christianity nor am I overwhelmed by the history of the Christian Church.

What I do see is a consistent pattern to explore and evaluate alternate sources while steadfastly ignoring the common sense language of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I am not an Old or New Testament scholar, nor am I an historian. I also do not possess a science degree and I have not made it my life’s work to defend the track record of the Christian Church. And, I suspect, I am not alone.

But I have studied how we have obtained the Scriptures, both Old and New Testaments, I have examined the scholarly work of those who have dedicated their lives to validating the authenticity of our Bible and I have read and formed opinions on scientific/religious conflicting points of view. I have studied world history and I have spent a significant amount of time tracing the journey of the Christian Church and I have read and continue to study the Word of God. My journey has led me to the Cross, where I have knelt and accepted the grace that has been placed before me via the shed blood of my Saviour Jesus Christ. And I know that I am not alone.

The evolution of New Age Thinking as explained to us in Eckhart Tolle’s book, “A New Earth” is not insignificant, in fact, in all probability, from my perspective, it is and will continue to shake our Christian belief system to its very core. There will be division, within our society, within the Christian Church and within our homes. To those who share our Christian heritage and faith, this is a call to arms, and we would be wise to prepare for the battle which is to come.

The benchmark or the yard stick per sec, the Christian biblical scriptures, are the means whereby alternate external sources are evaluated and also the means whereby we come to a more through understanding on any given subject that is expounded upon within the scriptures themselves. Is that a closed mentality, I would surmise to many it is, but to those who trust in the Word of God, trust in His revelation, trust in the Gospel of Jesus Christ, it is not only very logical to do so, but in fact is what the scriptures themselves indicate we are to do. Examples of this closed mentality are as follows:

“All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.” 2 Timothy 3:16-17

“…Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish.” Ephesians 5:25-27

For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food. For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe. But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.” Hebrews 5:12-14

“If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him. He who does not love Me does not keep My words….” John 14:23-24

“Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls. ” James 1:21

“Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall according to the same example of disobedience. For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” Hebrew 4:11-12

“Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written: ‘This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’ For laying aside the commandment of God, you hold the tradition of men.” Mark 7:6-8

“I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed…. For do I now persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? For if I still pleased men, I would not be a bondservant of Christ.” Galatians 1:6-8,10

“…they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers.” Acts 2:42

“For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also for the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, ‘The just shall live by faith.’” Romans 1:16-17

“Be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.

“Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith with which you will be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked one.

“And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God; praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints….” Ephesians 6:10-18

To all who are entertaining accepting the path that Eckhart Tolle has laid out before you, I would say, stop, and take a serious look at what is actually being proposed and earnestly consider the source of these teachings before moving forward. I would also admonish all who are considering Eckhart Tolle’s solution to take into account our Christian heritage and the numerous benefits it has produced, in spite of its short falls, before abandoning that which our forefathers passed onto us.

You know, I’ve been reading over the comments on this blog and some others blogs and it crossed my mind that those who disagree with the premise that the Word of God is the authoritative yardstick by which we are to discern what is the message or Revelation that God has given us, would have me set aside what it says, so that I would accommodate their premise. That is to say, that there are alternate sources of illumination, alternate perspectives, which I should entertain. Furthermore, when I do quote a scripture from my yardstick that sends from my perspective, a pretty clear statement, an example of which is, ”Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” Acts 4:12“, the response is typically rooted in an alternate source, and invariably explains it away by indicating that “different labels” are being used from an alternate source and essentially there is no conflict between the alternate source and the meaning conveyed in the chosen scripture.

Excuse me, but I do not buy that. The root of their argument is consistently centered on alternate sources. The institution of Christianity is not my yardstick, the Christian scriptures are. I quote Craig’s response to the question about the Trinity at http://prolepticlife.wordpress.com/ as another example, “Interestingly, the triune nature of God is central to the Gnostic Gospels which were excluded from the orthodox canon and considered heretical. In the Gospel of Philip, we see written, “…the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.” Excuse me, the Gnostic Gospels are not the yardstick.

Every conceivable source from Krishnamurti, Paramahansa Yoginanda, and a host of others has been thrown into the ring of this discussion. Excuse me, they are not the yardstick.

My personal relationship with God has not been overwhelmed by the institution of Christianity nor am I overwhelmed by the history of the Christian Church.

I see a consistent pattern to explore and evaluate alternate sources while steadfastly ignoring the common sense language of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I don’t buy it and God granting me grace, I never will.

Eckhart Tolles’ “A New Earth” has produced a significant amount of discussion and debate with regard to his teachings being in line with the basic teachings of the Bible, especially the New Testament. There are many who hold up Eckhart Tolle’s banner stating that his teachings breath new life into the deeper truths of the Gospel, and there are many who see Tolle’s message as being exactly the opposite. Having a good working knowledge of what the Bible says and a balanced perspective of what the Gospel represents is a basic requirement to make an informed decision about the discussion and the debate, especially when it comes to discussion with others who oppose our point of view. The discussions and debates that I have read and participated in clearly indicate that nothing is taken at face value any more. Literally everything is challenged, be it the authenticity of the the Scriptures (both Old and New Testaments), our interpretation of recorded history, the method whereby we interpret the Scriptures, and of course, the track record of the Christian Church. The task at hand can be overwhelming at times.

I am not an Old or New Testament scholar, nor am I an historian. I also do not possess a science degree and I have not made it my life’s work to defend the track record of the Christian Church. And, I suspect, I am not alone.

But I have studied how we have obtained the Scriptures, both Old and New Testaments, I have examined the scholarly work of those who have dedicated their lives to validating the authenticity of our Bible and I have read and formed opinions on scientific/religious conflicting points of view. I have studied world history and I have spent a significant amount of time tracing the journey of the Christian Church and I have read and continue to study the Word of God. My journey has led me to the Cross, where I have knelt and accepted the grace that has been placed before me via the shed blood of my Saviour Jesus Christ. And I know that I am not alone.

The evolution of New Age Thinking is not insignificant, in fact, in our day and age, it is and will continue to shake our Christian belief system to its very core. There will be division, within our society, within the Christian Church and within our homes. To those who share our Christian heritage and faith, this is a call to arms, the sword has been brought out and we had better prepare for the battle which is to come.

“Be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.

“Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith with which you will be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked one.

“And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God; praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints….” Ephesians 6:10-18

Good Morning.

I submit the following Holy scriptures and excerpts from the commentary penned by our own Prolepticlife in his article “You Ain’t I Am” (see Blogroll links) as the apex or corner stone for all other discussion under the Eckhart Tolle topic. Short story - you can’t have it both ways.

There cannot be any area of agreement here between what the scriptures indicate and what Eckhart Tolle indicates, these two premises are in total disagreement with one another, and I would conclude that Eckhart Tolle is acutely aware of this.

In A New Earth, Eckhart Tolle states, “The truth is inseparable from who you are. Yes, you are the Truth. If you look for it elsewhere, you will be deceived every time. The very Being that you are is Truth. Jesus tried to convey that when he said, “I am the way and the truth and the life.” These words uttered by Jesus are one of the most powerful and direct pointers to the Truth, if understood correctly. If misinterpreted, however, they become a great obstacle. Jesus speaks of the innermost I Am, the essence identity of every man and woman, every life-form, in fact. He speaks of the life that you are. … (p.71)

One interpretation points towards God, the “I Am that I Am” as the source of our salvation and the other interpretation points towards man and his awareness that he is part of the I Am and therefore his own I Am, i.e. his own salvation.

Consider the following:

Isaiah 14:12-14 “12How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

14I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.”

—————————————————————————–

Exodus 3:13-15 “13And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?

14And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.

15And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, the LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.”

—————————————————————————

A New Earth: “Can I sense my essential Beingness, the I Am, in the background of my life at all times? To be more accurate, can I sense the I Am that I Am at this moment? Can I sense my essential identity as consciousness itself?” (p. 79)

Proleptic Life - Eckhart Tolle - You Ain’t I Am March 20, 2008

” …we find Jesus in a heated discussion with a group of Jewish religious leaders. The discussion centered around the identity of Jesus. The catalyst for this debate was Jesus’ statement, quoted above, that He is the light of the world. The discussion went down a path in which these Jewish men defended their position by stating they were Abraham’s descendants and therefore were not in need of the freedom that Jesus offered them. In the midst of this discussion Jesus makes the incredible claim that he and Abraham knew each other. The Jews responded with disdain for the idea that Jesus, being less than 50 years old could have known Abraham.

Well, that is when Jesus speaks the most astounding words a human could speak. Words, which if untrue, condemn him as a blasphemer, or at best a crazy man. These were some of the most shocking words that could have been spoken by Jesus. This short sentence was so horrifying to those who heard them, they immediately preceded to try and have him stoned to death.

What did Jesus say that provoked such horror, shock and revulsion? He said, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was I AM.”

This statement not only helps us understand the importance of the other “I Am” statements of Jesus, they help us see Jesus own understanding of himself.

So what was it about those two tiny words that provoked such an angry reaction? Those two words were the words which were given to Moses as being the name of God. In the Hebrew the words are akin to the name Jehovah, or Yahweh. When Moses was told by God to return to Egypt and be an instrument of deliverance, Moses asked God what he should say when he was asked who sent him. The Lord’s answer was tell them “I Am” sent you. God said “I Am that I Am.”

This name, unlike some of the other names of God found in the Old Testament, sets God apart as the one and only self-existent Being. He is that which men, nor angels, nor any other created being could be - the self-existent and self-dependent God. This was the name of God any Jew feared to utter or even write.

Yet these were the words that fell from the lips of Jesus. “Before Abraham was, I Am.” Notice what Jesus did not say. He did not say, “before Abraham was, I was.” That would be a better grammatical construction, but it would hide what Jesus was saying about himself. Abraham, a mere mortal man, “was.” He had a beginning and and ending. But Christ says of himself “I Am.” He himself is the eternal, self-existent, self-dependent Yahweh, Jehovah God who spoke to Moses at the burning bush. The Son of God did not begin his existence in the manger of Bethlehem. He has always been. He is eternal God.”

“…When Jesus applied this name to himself the Jews said he blasphemed God. They were right - if it wasn’t true. If Jesus Christ is not God, then he is a blasphemer. The same thing is true of Eckhart Tolle. It is blasphemy to take the name of the self-existent, self-dependent, eternal God and apply it to yourself. But this is exactly what Tolle does. In doing so he tells us clearly what he believes about the nature of God, human nature, who Jesus Christ is, and how salvation should be defined. None of the things he believes on these subjects is what Jesus believed or taught. Jesus calls us to believe in Him - not in ourselves. He says he himself is the truth - not that we are the truth. Eckhart points you to yourself for salvation. God calls us to look away from ourselves and unto Jesus Christ, the risen Lord.”

One cannot adhere to both premises at the same time, they are like two magnets of the same polarity, for they both claim acceptance to the exclusion of the other.The cunningness of deception is that the new awareness of the I Am of oneself moves us away from the I Am of our salvation.

REINVENTING JESUS, THE NEW JESUS by WARREN SMITH

In 1992 I wrote a book about my experiences in the metaphysical “new age” movement. The book was entitled The Light That Was Dark. I wrote the book because I wanted to warn people about the incredibly deceptive teachings of the “new age.” From my own experience I knew just how powerfully seductive the spirit world is and how appealing its false teachings can be. At the end of my book I warned that Christian believers were becoming involved in some of these same teachings and deceptions. Spiritual deception is not just something that happens to unbelievers…

This book is available to read free or download online

http://www.reinventingjesuschrist.com/

The Great Heretical Idea: Oprah and Eckhart Do the New Age Shift

by Warren Smith

Part 1 (See Part II, Part III, Part IV)

“Get ready to be awakened.”[1] – Oprah

“The twenty-first century will be the time of awakening, of meeting The Creator Within. Many beings will experience Oneness with God and with all of life. This will be the beginning of the golden age of the New Human, of which it has been written; the time of the universal human, which has been eloquently described by those with deep insight among you.

“There are many such people in the world now – teachers and messengers, Masters and visionaries – who are placing this vision before humankind and offering tools with which to create it. These messengers and visionaries are the heralds of a New Age.”[2] –”God” Neale Donald Walsch, Friendship With God

“…[T]his book itself is a transformational device that has come out of the arising new consciousness. The ideas and concepts presented here may be important, but they are secondary. They are no more than signposts pointing toward awakening. As you read, a shift takes place within you.”

“This book’s main purpose is not to add new information or beliefs to your mind or to try to convince you of anything, but to bring about a shift in consciousness, that is to say, to awaken…. It will change your state of consciousness or it will be meaningless. It can only awaken those who are ready. Not everyone is ready yet, but many are, and with each person who awakens, the momentum in the collective consciousness grows, and it becomes easier for others.”[3] – Eckhart Tolle, The New Earth

“Don’t get attached to any one word. You can substitute ‘Christ’ for presence, if that is more meaningful to you. Christ is your God-essence or the Self, as it is sometimes called in the East. The only difference between Christ and presence is that Christ refers to your indwelling divinity regardless of whether you are conscious of it or not, whereas presence means your awakened divinity or God-essence.”[4] – Eckhart Tolle, The Power of Now

I stared at the huge stack of books in the Barnes & Noble bookstore. The title of the book was A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life Purpose. The title sounded like a new book by Purpose-Driven pastor Rick Warren, but it was actually the latest selection in Oprah’s Book Club. A colorful orange and blue paper band around the book invited the reader to”Join Oprah and Eckhart for a worldwide web event… Every Monday night beginning March 3, 2008 for 10 weeks… Register at Oprah.com/anewearth.” A personal message from Oprah stated: “Get ready to be awakened.”

It was clear to me that Oprah was no longer content to just popularize New Age beliefs, she would now teach them. This was a bold move by a woman who was obviously willing to do everything in her power – which is considerable – to convert the world to her New Age worldview.

The Shift

With friend and New Age author Marianne Williamson simultaneously teaching A Course in Miracles daily on Oprah & Friends XM Satellite Radio, Oprah now offers two very public New Age classes. These classes are teaching millions of people that the way to save themselves and the planet is not by accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, but rather by accepting”the Christ within.” For someone who probably has an aversion to traditional proselytizing, Oprah is giving new meaning to the word”proselytize” as she continues to push her New Age beliefs upon the world. But, in defense of her role as a New Age proselytizer, Oprah would probably be the first to tell you – it’s all for the good of the world. She would also probably argue that what she is teaching is not New Age, but a”New Spirituality.” Curiously, that just happens to be the same term that some emerging church leaders like Brian McLaren are using as they introduce New Age ideas and language into the church.[5]

Oprah can call her New Age teachings whatever she wants, but she and her ever-growing band of New Age colleagues are still teaching that”we are all one” because we are all”God” and”Christ.” As Marianne Williamson writes,”We are all one, we are love itself. ‘Accepting the Christ’ is merely a shift in self-perception.”[6]

The”shift” Williamson, Oprah and Tolle describe is”awakening” to the”Christ within” and the”God within.”"Shift” is the key word. It means to move from one position to another – as in shifting one’s awareness away from the mind and”ego” to the collective “Christ consciousness” or”Christ within.” And, as in shifting your belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior to a New Age belief in the”Christ within.” With her New Age classrooms on satellite radio, and now on the Internet, Oprah apparently feels an urgency to teach everyone how to”awaken” and make this”shift” to the”Christ” within. With her Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN) kicking in next year we can expect to see her New Age views showcased on an even grander scale.

In her first class with Eckhart Tolle, Oprah asked if people had experienced the”shift” while reading Tolle’s book, A New Earth. The question reminded me of Werner Erhard’s New Age EST program in the 1970s that taught this same idea of shifting one’s perception, and then similarly asking – “Did you get IT?” Obviously, there is pressure to”get IT” – to feel the shift: Oprah felt the shift – did you? Are you understanding this new [age] way of looking at yourself and the world? Or, are you being blocked by your mind and your ego from seeing this New Spirituality that can save our planet? Keep logging onto our classes. Keep reading Tolle’s book – you’ll ‘get it.’

Years earlier, when launching the New Age movement publicly with her book The Aquarian Conspiracy, Marilyn Ferguson introduced this concept of the”shift,” connecting it to the mystical ideas of Teilhard de Chardin – the father of the New Age movement –”whose new perspective would trigger a critical contagion of change” which would result in the”rapid transformation of the human species, beginning with a vanguard” of emerging leaders. She explained how scientist-philosopher Thomas Kuhn coined the term”paradigm shift” to describe”a distinctly new way of thinking” which entailed accepting new truths. When”the new paradigm gains ascendance” and”a critical number of thinkers has accepted the new idea, a collective paradigm shift has occurred.” Ferguson said the”shift” would result in a”new knowing” of the occult world called an”awakening” of”deep inner shifts.”[7]

Evolve or Die

Tolle’s book A New Earth – like A Course in Miracles and other New Age teachings – exploits the idea that the world is at a crisis point and insists that we must”spiritually evolve” as a species to avoid personal and planetary disaster. According to New Age leaders like Tolle, spiritually evolving means”shifting” or converting to the heretical belief that we are all”God” and that we are all “Christ.”

In both his book and his class with Oprah, Tolle reiterated the words that New Age leader Barbara Marx Hubbard was given by her New Age”Christ” –”evolve or die.”[8] In other words, don’t feel any pressure, but if you don’t”shift” your point of view, and”get it” that”we are all one” and that”we are all God,” our planet will probably be destroyed and our human species will become extinct.

Tolle and Oprah stayed away from the harsher aspects of this”evolve or die” dictate in that first Internet class. Hubbard, however, has made it clear that in the future, those who refuse to make the”shift” by seeing themselves as”God” will be eliminated by something called”the selection process.”[9] Hubbard, who is highly respected by her New Age colleagues, claims that her”Christ” has laid out an Armageddon alternative peace plan to save the planet. This peace plan is predicated on accepting the”shift” in consciousness that Oprah and Tolle (and other New Age leaders) are teaching – the”shift” to the Christ within.

Hubbard’s New Age view of the future inspired her to be one of the co-founders of the World Future Society and she is currently listed as a member of its Global Advisory Council.[10] Emergent leader at the”vanguard” of church”transformation,” Brian McLaren, has also written about an Armageddon alternative [11] and just happens to be one of the featured speakers at the upcoming World Future Society’s annual gathering.

Surprised by the Truth

In describing their New Age/New Spirituality”shift” and the necessity for everyone to spiritually evolve, Eckhart Tolle erroneously states that once you”awaken” to your Christ-consciousness and your own godhood, the shift is”irreversible.”[12] What he neglects to take into account is that there are large numbers of us who formerly made the”shift” to these New Age beliefs only to discover – by the grace of God – that we had been greatly deceived by these New Age teachings. The Bible proved itself to be true as it exposed the New Age/New Spirituality for what it was – a lie. It was very humbling for us to realize that the Bible was true after all, and our New Age beliefs were wrong. God was God and we were not. Jesus was the one and only Christ. There was no universal”Christ-consciousness” or”Christ within.” We were amazed to discover that there really was a deceptive spirit world and an actual devil; that we really were sinners that needed to be saved by Jesus Christ. What we came to understand was that the whole New Age plan to save the world was part of the very deception that Jesus warned would come at the time of the end (Matthew 24). We were stunned by the truth of the Bible and shocked at our own gullibility to have believed that we were”God” and”Christ.” We had been very sincere about our New Age beliefs, but we were sincerely wrong – as are Oprah and Tolle.

The New Age paradigm”shift” is a deceptive device that is being cleverly used by a very real spiritual Adversary who is out to deceive the world. One of the definitions of”shift” in Webster’s Dictionary is”a deceitful scheme or method; a trick.”[13] The New Age/New Spirituality”shift” advocated by Oprah and Tolle is such a”shift.” It is, in every sense of the word, diabolically”shifty.”

(See Part II, Part III, Part IV)

Endnotes:
1. Eckhart Tolle, The New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose (New York: Plume, 2005), paper band encircling book.
2. Neale Donald Walsch, Friendship with God: an uncommon dialogue (New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1999), p. 295-6.
3. Tolle, The New Earth, p. 6-7.
4. Eckhart Tolle, The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment (Novato, CA: Namaste, 1999), p. 104.
5. Brian McLaren, quote cited in Faith Undone by Roger Oakland (Silverton, OR: Lighthouse Trails, 2007), p. 11.
6. Marianne Williamson, A Return to Love: Reflections on the Principles of A Course in Miracles (New York: Harper Perennial, 1996), p. 32.
7. Marilyn Ferguson, The Aquarian Conspiracy: Personal and Social Transformation in the 1980s (Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher, 1980), pp. 25-32.
8. Tolle, A New Earth, p. 21. Barbara Marx Hubbard lecture at Texas A & M University, September 11, 2002, information taken from The Aggie Daily, September 12, 2002. Warren Smith, Reinventing Jesus Christ: The New Gospel (Ravenna, OH: Conscience Press, 2002), pp. 16, 19.
9. Smith, Ibid.
10.”WorldFuture 2008: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes,” World Future Society conference brochure, http://www.wfs.org/March
April08/WF2008_preliminary.pdf

11. Brian McLaren, The Secret Message of Jesus: Uncovering the Truth that Could Change Everything (Nashville, TN: W Publishing Group, 2006), p. 175.
12. Tolle, The New Earth, p. 7.
13. Websters New World Dictionary (New York: Websters New World Dictionaries, 1988).

In the spring of 1989 syndicated talk show host Larry King interviewed Shirley MacLaine on the New Age. When a Christian caller contested her view with an appeal to the New Testament, MacLaine brushed him off with the objection that the Bible has been changed and translated so many times over the last 2000 years that it’s impossible to have any confidence in its accuracy. King was quick to endorse her “facts.” “Everyone knows that,” he grunted.
Fortunately, this false assumption is groundless.
In a simplified form, this is how the science of textual criticism works. Textual critics are academics who reconstruct a missing original from existing manuscripts that are generations removed from the autograph. According to New Testament scholar F.F. Bruce, “Its object [is] to determine as exactly as possible from the available evidence the original words of the documents in question.”
The science of textual criticism is used to test all documents of antiquity–not just religious texts–including historical and literary writings. It’s not a theological enterprise based on haphazard hopes and guesses; it’s a linguistic exercise that follows a set of established rules. Textual criticism allows an alert critic to determine the extent of possible corruption of any work.
New Testament specialist Daniel Wallace notes that although there are about 300,000 individual variations of the text of the New Testament, this number is very misleading. Most of the differences are completely inconsequential–spelling errors, inverted phrases and the like. A side by side comparison between the two main text families (the Majority Text and the modern critical text) shows agreement a full 98% of the time.
Of the remaining differences, virtually all yield to vigorous textual criticism. This means that our New Testament is 99.5% textually pure. In the entire text of 20,000 lines, only 40 lines are in doubt (about 400 words), and none affects any significant doctrine.

Greek scholar D.A. Carson sums up this way: “The purity of text is of such a substantial nature that nothing we believe to be true, and nothing we are commanded to do, is in any way jeopardized by the variants.”
This issue is no longer contested by non-Christian scholars, and for good reason. Simply put, if we reject the authenticity of the New Testament on textual grounds we’d have to reject every ancient work of antiquity and declare null and void every piece of historical information from written sources prior to the beginning of the second millennium A.D.
To quote Sir Frederick Kenyon, from The Bible and Theology:
The interval between the dates of the original composition and the earliest extant evidence becomes so small as to be in fact negligible, and the last foundation for any doubt that the Scriptures have come down to us substantially as they were written has now been removed. Both the authenticity and the general integrity of the books of the New Testament may be regarded as finally established.
Has the New Testament been altered? Critical, academic analysis says it has not.
Eye witness accounts, lets take a look at the evidence:
Peter, John, and Matthew were in the original apostolic company; they were with Jesus during his ministry for three and one-half years. They were by his side virtually day by day, hence they wrote as eyewitnesses of the things they saw and heard.
James (not the brother of John; cf. Acts 12:2) was a leader in the Jerusalem church (Acts 15:13; cf. Galatians 2:9), and a half-brother of Jesus (Galatians 1:19; cf. Acts 1:14). At first he and his brothers did not believe on Christ (John 7:5; cf. Matthew 13:57), but later he happily acknowledged himself as “a servant of God and the Lord Jesus Christ” (James 1:1). James’ credibility is extremely high, because something overcame his natural reticence to endorse his brother’s claims. Only the Savior’s resurrection explains that turnaround. Too, since Jude was a brother of James, and thus also a half-brother of Jesus, he too overcame an initial disbelief and acknowledged Christ as Lord (Jude 1).
Mark was the son of Mary of Jerusalem, and the cousin of Barnabas (Colossians 4:10). She must have had a close relationship with the apostles, because Peter went immediately to her house when he was released from prison (Acts 12:12ff).

The familiarity of this family with the apostles is confirmed by Peter’s reference to Mark as his “son” (1 Peter 5:13), suggesting a spiritual relationship (cf. 1 Timothy 1:2). Thus, Mark himself would have been a witness of many of Jesus’ deeds. Several ancient writers (e.g., Papias, Irenaeus, and Tertullian) testify that Mark’s Gospel reflects Peter’s influence.
Luke was a Greek whose Gospel narrative was grounded in the eyewitness testimony of those familiar with Christ “from the beginning” (Luke 1:1-4). After studying Luke’s writings carefully, Sir William Ramsay—once a skeptic himself—declared that “Luke’s history is unsurpassed in respect of its trustworthiness” (1979, 81).
Saul of Tarsus (Paul), of course, was a scholar of no meager ability. He was contemporary with Christ and became acquainted with at least some of the apostles (cf. Galatians 1:18). His defenses of Christianity are classic (see Acts 22; 26). Though there is no evidence that Paul saw Christ face-to-face before that encounter on the Jerusalem-to-Damascus road, he had ample opportunity to know the facts regarding Jesus’ miracles, teachings, and influence.
Council of Nicaea
The year 325 is accepted without hesitation as that of the First Council of Nicaea.
The adhesion was general and enthusiastic. All the bishops save five declared themselves ready to subscribe to this formula, convinced that it contained the ancient faith of the Apostolic Church. The opponents were soon reduced to two, Theonas of Marmarica and Secundus of Ptolemais, who were exiled and anathematized. St. Athanasius, a member of the council speaks of 300, and in his letter “Ad Afros” he says explicitly 318. This figure is almost universally adopted, and there seems to be no good reason for rejecting it.
“We believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten of the Father, that is, of the substance [ek tes ousias] of the Father, God of God, light of light, true God of true God, begotten not made, of the same substance with the Father [homoousion to patri], through whom all things were made both in heaven and on earth; who for us men and our salvation descended, was incarnate, and was made man, suffered and rose again the third day, ascended into heaven and cometh to judge the living and the dead. And in the Holy Ghost. Those who say: There was a time when He was not, and He was not before He was begotten; and that He was made our of nothing (ex ouk onton); or who maintain that He is of another hypostasis or another substance [than the Father], or that the Son of God is created, or mutable, or subject to change, [them] the Catholic Church anathematizes.”

Older Posts »